Rick Pollick
← All writing
9 min readMembers

Change Advisory Boards Can't Keep Up With Agents: Rebuilding Change Approval as Policy as Code

A weekly change advisory board was built for a world of a few dozen changes a week. Agent-assisted delivery breaks that queue within months. Here is why CAB approval adds delay without adding safety, and how to rebuild change management as risk-tiered lanes, policy as code, and pipeline-generated evidence.

Change Advisory Boards Can't Keep Up With Agents: Rebuilding Change Approval as Policy as Code

The change advisory board is the most expensive safety theater in enterprise IT, and agentic delivery is about to make that impossible to ignore. Every Tuesday, in companies I have worked with and companies I have advised, a room of senior people reviews a spreadsheet of changes they did not write, cannot fully evaluate, and will approve almost every time. The meeting does not reduce risk. It batches risk, delays it, and adds a signature.

Members only

Keep reading for $2 / month.

The rest of this essay — along with every other members-only post, playbook, and working note — is behind a small paywall. Cancel anytime.

Payment handled by Stripe. Card details never touch this site.

change advisory boardCABchange managementpolicy as codechange approvalagentic AI deliveryDORA metricsstreamlined change approvalrisk-tiered changeITIL change enablementOpen Policy Agentrelease managementtechnical project managementaudit evidencecontinuous delivery governance
Change Advisory Boards Can't Keep Up With Agents: Rebuilding Change Approval as Policy as Code — Rick Pollick